Kathmandu — The Independent Lawyers’ Forum has expressed serious concern over remarks made by Nepal Bar Association President and senior advocate Dr. Vijay Prasad Mishra, stating that his comments are inconsistent with constitutional principles and public sentiment.
Remarks at Bhaktapur Conference Draw Criticism
In a statement, the forum objected to remarks delivered by Mishra during the 33rd Women Lawyers’ National Conference held in Bhaktapur on Falgun 7. His statement, “We will take a position against a two-thirds majority government,” has drawn criticism, with the forum describing it as inappropriate and concerning.
According to the statement issued by Acting President Advocate Harichandra Bhattarai, such remarks contradict the core principles of constitutionalism and the sovereignty vested in the people by Nepal’s Constitution. The forum said the statement appeared threatening in nature and undermined public opinion, thereby hurting the sentiments of sovereign citizens.
Call to Adhere to Constitutional and Institutional Limits
The forum also urged the Nepal Bar Association president to remain within the limits of his constitutional and institutional role. It specifically referred to Article 129 of the Constitution, which outlines provisions related to the appointment of the Chief Justice and other judges, as well as the Bar Association’s own statutes.
Furthermore, the forum recalled key reports prepared by the commission led by former Supreme Court Justice Hari Krishna Karki and the Judicial Restructuring Committee coordinated by senior advocate Purna Man Shakya. It noted that both reports have already been endorsed by the Nepal Bar Association’s national conference, emphasizing the need to respect and uphold those recommendations.
The forum concluded by stressing that legal institutions must act with restraint, responsibility, and adherence to constitutional principles to maintain public trust.
